0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.13	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.13/0.34	% Computer   : n016.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 14:08:08 EDT 2021
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.13/0.34	% Number of cores: 8
0.13/0.35	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.21/0.35	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.21/0.35	# No SInE strategy applied
0.21/0.35	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.21/0.41	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S08CI
0.21/0.41	# and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
0.21/0.41	#
0.21/0.41	# Preprocessing time       : 0.033 s
0.21/0.41	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.21/0.41	
0.21/0.41	# Proof found!
0.21/0.41	# SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.41	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.41	thf(o, axiom, (o)=(^[X25:reg, X26:reg]:?[X22:reg]:(![X96:reg]:(c @ X96 @ X22=>c @ X96 @ X25)&![X97:reg]:(c @ X97 @ X22=>c @ X97 @ X26))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax', o)).
0.21/0.41	thf(p, axiom, (p)=(^[X20:reg, X21:reg]:![X22:reg]:(c @ X22 @ X20=>c @ X22 @ X21)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax', p)).
0.21/0.41	thf(ec, axiom, (ec)=(^[X29:reg, X30:reg]:(c @ X29 @ X30&~(?[X103:reg]:(![X104:reg]:(c @ X104 @ X103=>c @ X104 @ X29)&![X105:reg]:(c @ X105 @ X103=>c @ X105 @ X30))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax', ec)).
0.21/0.41	thf(pp, axiom, (pp)=(^[X31:reg, X32:reg]:(![X106:reg]:(c @ X106 @ X31=>c @ X106 @ X32)&~(![X107:reg]:(c @ X107 @ X32=>c @ X107 @ X31)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax', pp)).
0.21/0.41	thf(ntpp, axiom, (ntpp)=(^[X35:reg, X36:reg]:((![X116:reg]:(c @ X116 @ X35=>c @ X116 @ X36)&~(![X117:reg]:(c @ X117 @ X36=>c @ X117 @ X35)))&~(?[X22:reg]:((c @ X22 @ X35&~(?[X118:reg]:(![X119:reg]:(c @ X119 @ X118=>c @ X119 @ X22)&![X120:reg]:(c @ X120 @ X118=>c @ X120 @ X35))))&(c @ X22 @ X36&~(?[X121:reg]:(![X122:reg]:(c @ X122 @ X121=>c @ X122 @ X22)&![X123:reg]:(c @ X123 @ X121=>c @ X123 @ X36)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax', ntpp)).
0.21/0.41	thf(eq, axiom, (eq)=(^[X23:reg, X24:reg]:(![X94:reg]:(c @ X94 @ X23=>c @ X94 @ X24)&![X95:reg]:(c @ X95 @ X24=>c @ X95 @ X23))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax', eq)).
0.21/0.41	thf(mimplies, axiom, (mimplies)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o, X56:$i]:(~(X6 @ X56)|X7 @ X56)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax', mimplies)).
0.21/0.41	thf(mnot, axiom, (mnot)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:~(X6 @ X3)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax', mnot)).
0.21/0.41	thf(mor, axiom, (mor)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(X6 @ X3|X7 @ X3)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax', mor)).
0.21/0.41	thf(ax3, axiom, mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[X41:$i]:ntpp @ paris @ france)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax3)).
0.21/0.41	thf(mbox, axiom, (mbox)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:![X14:$i]:(~(X13 @ X3 @ X14)|X6 @ X14)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax', mbox)).
0.21/0.41	thf(mvalid, axiom, (mvalid)=(^[X6:$i > $o]:![X3:$i]:X6 @ X3), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax', mvalid)).
0.21/0.41	thf(con, conjecture, mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[X40:$i]:~(eq @ catalunya @ paris))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
0.21/0.41	thf(ax2, axiom, mvalid @ (mbox @ fool @ (^[X43:$i]:ec @ spain @ france)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax2)).
0.21/0.41	thf(t_axiom_for_fool, axiom, mvalid @ (mforall_prop @ (^[X42:$i > $o]:mimplies @ (mbox @ fool @ X42) @ X42)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', t_axiom_for_fool)).
0.21/0.41	thf(mforall_prop, axiom, (mforall_prop)=(^[X9:($i > $o) > $i > $o, X3:$i]:![X10:$i > $o]:X9 @ X10 @ X3), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax', mforall_prop)).
0.21/0.41	thf(tpp, axiom, (tpp)=(^[X33:reg, X34:reg]:((![X108:reg]:(c @ X108 @ X33=>c @ X108 @ X34)&~(![X109:reg]:(c @ X109 @ X34=>c @ X109 @ X33)))&?[X22:reg]:((c @ X22 @ X33&~(?[X110:reg]:(![X111:reg]:(c @ X111 @ X110=>c @ X111 @ X22)&![X112:reg]:(c @ X112 @ X110=>c @ X112 @ X33))))&(c @ X22 @ X34&~(?[X113:reg]:(![X114:reg]:(c @ X114 @ X113=>c @ X114 @ X22)&![X115:reg]:(c @ X115 @ X113=>c @ X115 @ X34))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax', tpp)).
0.21/0.41	thf(ax1, axiom, mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[X44:$i]:tpp @ catalunya @ spain)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax1)).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_18, axiom, (o)=(^[X25:reg, X26:reg]:?[X22:reg]:(![X96:reg]:(c @ X96 @ X22=>c @ X96 @ X25)&![X97:reg]:(c @ X97 @ X22=>c @ X97 @ X26))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[o, p])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_19, axiom, (ec)=(^[X29:reg, X30:reg]:(c @ X29 @ X30&~(?[X103:reg]:(![X104:reg]:(c @ X104 @ X103=>c @ X104 @ X29)&![X105:reg]:(c @ X105 @ X103=>c @ X105 @ X30))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ec, c_0_18])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_20, axiom, (pp)=(^[X31:reg, X32:reg]:(![X106:reg]:(c @ X106 @ X31=>c @ X106 @ X32)&~(![X107:reg]:(c @ X107 @ X32=>c @ X107 @ X31)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[pp, p])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_21, axiom, (ntpp)=(^[X35:reg, X36:reg]:((![X116:reg]:(c @ X116 @ X35=>c @ X116 @ X36)&~(![X117:reg]:(c @ X117 @ X36=>c @ X117 @ X35)))&~(?[X22:reg]:((c @ X22 @ X35&~(?[X118:reg]:(![X119:reg]:(c @ X119 @ X118=>c @ X119 @ X22)&![X120:reg]:(c @ X120 @ X118=>c @ X120 @ X35))))&(c @ X22 @ X36&~(?[X121:reg]:(![X122:reg]:(c @ X122 @ X121=>c @ X122 @ X22)&![X123:reg]:(c @ X123 @ X121=>c @ X123 @ X36)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ntpp, c_0_19]), c_0_20])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_22, axiom, (eq)=(^[X23:reg, X24:reg]:(![X94:reg]:(c @ X94 @ X23=>c @ X94 @ X24)&![X95:reg]:(c @ X95 @ X24=>c @ X95 @ X23))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[eq, p])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_23, axiom, (mimplies)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o, X56:$i]:(~(X6 @ X56)|X7 @ X56)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[mimplies, mnot]), mor])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_24, plain, ![X171:$i, X183:$i]:(~a @ X171 @ X183|((![X184:reg]:(c @ X184 @ paris=>c @ X184 @ france)&~(![X185:reg]:(c @ X185 @ france=>c @ X185 @ paris)))&~(?[X186:reg]:((c @ X186 @ paris&~(?[X187:reg]:(![X188:reg]:(c @ X188 @ X187=>c @ X188 @ X186)&![X189:reg]:(c @ X189 @ X187=>c @ X189 @ paris))))&(c @ X186 @ france&~(?[X190:reg]:(![X191:reg]:(c @ X191 @ X190=>c @ X191 @ X186)&![X192:reg]:(c @ X192 @ X190=>c @ X192 @ france)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax3, mbox]), mvalid]), c_0_21])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ~(![X133:$i, X138:$i]:(~a @ X133 @ X138|~((![X139:reg]:(c @ X139 @ catalunya=>c @ X139 @ paris)&![X140:reg]:(c @ X140 @ paris=>c @ X140 @ catalunya))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]), mbox]), mvalid]), c_0_22])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_26, plain, ![X223:$i, X229:$i]:(~fool @ X223 @ X229|(c @ spain @ france&~(?[X230:reg]:(![X231:reg]:(c @ X231 @ X230=>c @ X231 @ spain)&![X232:reg]:(c @ X232 @ X230=>c @ X232 @ france))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax2, mbox]), mvalid]), c_0_19])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X205:$i, X209:$i > $o]:(~(![X210:$i]:(~fool @ X205 @ X210|X209 @ X210))|X209 @ X205), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[t_axiom_for_fool, c_0_23]), mforall_prop]), mbox]), mvalid])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_28, axiom, (tpp)=(^[X33:reg, X34:reg]:((![X108:reg]:(c @ X108 @ X33=>c @ X108 @ X34)&~(![X109:reg]:(c @ X109 @ X34=>c @ X109 @ X33)))&?[X22:reg]:((c @ X22 @ X33&~(?[X110:reg]:(![X111:reg]:(c @ X111 @ X110=>c @ X111 @ X22)&![X112:reg]:(c @ X112 @ X110=>c @ X112 @ X33))))&(c @ X22 @ X34&~(?[X113:reg]:(![X114:reg]:(c @ X114 @ X113=>c @ X114 @ X22)&![X115:reg]:(c @ X115 @ X113=>c @ X115 @ X34))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[tpp, c_0_19]), c_0_20])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X357:$i, X358:$i, X359:reg, X361:reg, X363:reg, X364:reg, X366:reg, X367:reg]:(((~c @ X359 @ paris|c @ X359 @ france|~a @ X357 @ X358)&((c @ esk3_0 @ france|~a @ X357 @ X358)&(~c @ esk3_0 @ paris|~a @ X357 @ X358)))&(((~c @ X366 @ (esk5_1 @ X361)|c @ X366 @ X361|~c @ X361 @ france|(~c @ X363 @ (esk4_1 @ X361)|c @ X363 @ X361|~c @ X361 @ paris)|~a @ X357 @ X358)&(~c @ X367 @ (esk5_1 @ X361)|c @ X367 @ france|~c @ X361 @ france|(~c @ X363 @ (esk4_1 @ X361)|c @ X363 @ X361|~c @ X361 @ paris)|~a @ X357 @ X358))&((~c @ X366 @ (esk5_1 @ X361)|c @ X366 @ X361|~c @ X361 @ france|(~c @ X364 @ (esk4_1 @ X361)|c @ X364 @ paris|~c @ X361 @ paris)|~a @ X357 @ X358)&(~c @ X367 @ (esk5_1 @ X361)|c @ X367 @ france|~c @ X361 @ france|(~c @ X364 @ (esk4_1 @ X361)|c @ X364 @ paris|~c @ X361 @ paris)|~a @ X357 @ X358)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])])])])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X355:reg, X356:reg]:(a @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0&((~c @ X355 @ catalunya|c @ X355 @ paris)&(~c @ X356 @ paris|c @ X356 @ catalunya))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_31, plain, ![X371:$i, X372:$i, X373:reg]:((c @ spain @ france|~fool @ X371 @ X372)&(((c @ (esk8_1 @ X373) @ X373|c @ (esk7_1 @ X373) @ X373|~fool @ X371 @ X372)&(~c @ (esk8_1 @ X373) @ france|c @ (esk7_1 @ X373) @ X373|~fool @ X371 @ X372))&((c @ (esk8_1 @ X373) @ X373|~c @ (esk7_1 @ X373) @ spain|~fool @ X371 @ X372)&(~c @ (esk8_1 @ X373) @ france|~c @ (esk7_1 @ X373) @ spain|~fool @ X371 @ X372)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])])])])])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_32, plain, ![X368:$i, X369:$i > $o]:((fool @ X368 @ (esk6_2 @ X368 @ X369)|X369 @ X368)&(~X369 @ (esk6_2 @ X368 @ X369)|X369 @ X368)), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])])])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X301:$i, X313:$i]:(~a @ X301 @ X313|((![X314:reg]:(c @ X314 @ catalunya=>c @ X314 @ spain)&~(![X315:reg]:(c @ X315 @ spain=>c @ X315 @ catalunya)))&?[X316:reg]:((c @ X316 @ catalunya&~(?[X317:reg]:(![X318:reg]:(c @ X318 @ X317=>c @ X318 @ X316)&![X319:reg]:(c @ X319 @ X317=>c @ X319 @ catalunya))))&(c @ X316 @ spain&~(?[X320:reg]:(![X321:reg]:(c @ X321 @ X320=>c @ X321 @ X316)&![X322:reg]:(c @ X322 @ X320=>c @ X322 @ spain))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax1, mbox]), mvalid]), c_0_28])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(c @ X18 @ france|~c @ X18 @ paris|~a @ X3 @ X14), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, a @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(c @ (esk8_1 @ X18) @ X18|c @ (esk7_1 @ X18) @ X18|~fool @ X3 @ X14), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_37, plain, ![X4:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(fool @ X3 @ (esk6_2 @ X3 @ X4)|X4 @ X3), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(c @ (esk7_1 @ X18) @ X18|~c @ (esk8_1 @ X18) @ france|~fool @ X3 @ X14), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_39, plain, ![X381:$i, X382:$i, X383:reg, X386:reg, X389:reg]:(((~c @ X383 @ catalunya|c @ X383 @ spain|~a @ X381 @ X382)&((c @ esk10_0 @ spain|~a @ X381 @ X382)&(~c @ esk10_0 @ catalunya|~a @ X381 @ X382)))&(((c @ esk11_0 @ catalunya|~a @ X381 @ X382)&(((c @ (esk13_1 @ X386) @ X386|c @ (esk12_1 @ X386) @ X386|~a @ X381 @ X382)&(~c @ (esk13_1 @ X386) @ catalunya|c @ (esk12_1 @ X386) @ X386|~a @ X381 @ X382))&((c @ (esk13_1 @ X386) @ X386|~c @ (esk12_1 @ X386) @ esk11_0|~a @ X381 @ X382)&(~c @ (esk13_1 @ X386) @ catalunya|~c @ (esk12_1 @ X386) @ esk11_0|~a @ X381 @ X382))))&((c @ esk11_0 @ spain|~a @ X381 @ X382)&(((c @ (esk15_1 @ X389) @ X389|c @ (esk14_1 @ X389) @ X389|~a @ X381 @ X382)&(~c @ (esk15_1 @ X389) @ spain|c @ (esk14_1 @ X389) @ X389|~a @ X381 @ X382))&((c @ (esk15_1 @ X389) @ X389|~c @ (esk14_1 @ X389) @ esk11_0|~a @ X381 @ X382)&(~c @ (esk15_1 @ X389) @ spain|~c @ (esk14_1 @ X389) @ esk11_0|~a @ X381 @ X382)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])])])])])])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(c @ X18 @ france|~c @ X18 @ paris), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_41, plain, ![X18:reg]:(c @ (esk8_1 @ X18) @ X18|c @ (esk7_1 @ X18) @ X18), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_37]), c_0_36])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_42, plain, ![X18:reg]:(c @ (esk7_1 @ X18) @ X18|~c @ (esk8_1 @ X18) @ france), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_37]), c_0_38])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_43, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(c @ X18 @ spain|~c @ X18 @ catalunya|~a @ X3 @ X14), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(c @ X18 @ catalunya|~c @ X18 @ paris), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, c @ (esk7_1 @ paris) @ paris, inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40, c_0_41]), c_0_42])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_46, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(c @ (esk8_1 @ X18) @ X18|~c @ (esk7_1 @ X18) @ spain|~fool @ X3 @ X14), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_47, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(c @ X18 @ spain|~c @ X18 @ catalunya), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43, c_0_35])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, c @ (esk7_1 @ paris) @ catalunya, inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_45])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_49, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(~c @ (esk8_1 @ X18) @ france|~c @ (esk7_1 @ X18) @ spain|~fool @ X3 @ X14), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_50, plain, ![X18:reg]:(c @ (esk8_1 @ X18) @ X18|~c @ (esk7_1 @ X18) @ spain), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46, c_0_37]), c_0_46])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_51, negated_conjecture, c @ (esk7_1 @ paris) @ spain, inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47, c_0_48])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_52, plain, ![X18:reg]:(~c @ (esk7_1 @ X18) @ spain|~c @ (esk8_1 @ X18) @ france), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49, c_0_37]), c_0_49])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_53, negated_conjecture, c @ (esk8_1 @ paris) @ paris, inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50, c_0_51])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_54, negated_conjecture, ~c @ (esk8_1 @ paris) @ france, inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52, c_0_51])).
0.21/0.41	thf(c_0_55, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40, c_0_53]), c_0_54]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.41	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.41	# Proof object total steps             : 56
0.21/0.41	# Proof object clause steps            : 21
0.21/0.41	# Proof object formula steps           : 35
0.21/0.41	# Proof object conjectures             : 13
0.21/0.41	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 10
0.21/0.41	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
0.21/0.41	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
0.21/0.41	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 18
0.21/0.41	# Proof object generating inferences   : 12
0.21/0.41	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 6
0.21/0.41	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.21/0.41	# Parsed axioms                        : 98
0.21/0.41	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.21/0.41	# Initial clauses                      : 85
0.21/0.41	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 49
0.21/0.41	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 36
0.21/0.41	# Processed clauses                    : 352
0.21/0.41	# ...of these trivial                  : 10
0.21/0.41	# ...subsumed                          : 58
0.21/0.41	# ...remaining for further processing  : 283
0.21/0.41	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.21/0.41	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.41	# Backward-subsumed                    : 36
0.21/0.41	# Backward-rewritten                   : 24
0.21/0.41	# Generated clauses                    : 1041
0.21/0.41	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 908
0.21/0.41	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 14
0.21/0.41	# Paramodulations                      : 1024
0.21/0.41	# Factorizations                       : 1
0.21/0.41	# NegExts                              : 0
0.21/0.41	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.21/0.41	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.41	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.41	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.41	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.41	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.41	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.41	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.41	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.41	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.41	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.41	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.41	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.41	# Current number of processed clauses  : 187
0.21/0.41	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 78
0.21/0.41	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.41	#    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.21/0.41	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 106
0.21/0.41	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 590
0.21/0.41	# ...number of literals in the above   : 2461
0.21/0.41	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.41	# Current number of archived clauses   : 96
0.21/0.41	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4645
0.21/0.41	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3302
0.21/0.41	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 86
0.21/0.41	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 406
0.21/0.41	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.41	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 25
0.21/0.41	# BW rewrite match successes           : 19
0.21/0.41	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.21/0.41	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.21/0.41	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 23621
0.21/0.41	
0.21/0.41	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.41	# User time                : 0.059 s
0.21/0.41	# System time              : 0.008 s
0.21/0.41	# Total time               : 0.067 s
0.21/0.41	# Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
0.21/0.42	EOF